Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | -- |
| -- | 2020-08-21 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 383 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is much better than Samsung W2016, getting a 90.8 score against 72.2. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 design is a little heavier but extremely thinner than Samsung W2016. Galaxy Note 20 has a little bit better processing power than Samsung W2016, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note 20 has a slightly better looking screen than Samsung W2016, because it has a really larger screen, a quite higher pixels density and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400. Galaxy Note 20 has a much better camera than Samsung W2016, because although it has a camera with a much worse 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light photography and a way better 7680x4320 video quality.
Galaxy Note 20 features a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung W2016, because it has 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy Note 20 counts with a much better battery lifetime than Samsung W2016, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity instead of 2000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.