Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-21 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than Samsung W2016, with a score of 98.9 against 72.2. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a much thinner but somewhat heavier cellphone than Samsung W2016. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version and Samsung W2016 has Android 5.1 Lollipop.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a sharper display than Samsung W2016, because it has a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, a greater screen pixel density and a much larger display. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Samsung W2016, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little faster processor than Samsung W2016, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures way better photos and videos than Samsung W2016, because it has a much more megapixels back facing camera, a bigger diafragm aperture for better images and videos in poorly lited situations and a lot better video quality.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much longer battery performance than Samsung W2016, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 2000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.