Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| -- | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.4 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 3.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 is better than Samsung W2016, getting an 81.2 score against 72.2. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note 3 has the previous 5.0 version and Samsung W2016 has Android 5.1 Lollipop version. Galaxy Note 3 is a noticeably thinner and a little bit lighter phone than the Samsung W2016.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a sharper display than Samsung W2016, because it has a lot larger display, a much higher 1920 x 1080 resolution and a little bit greater display density. Galaxy Note 3 has a bit better hardware performance than Samsung W2016, because although it has 4 less CPU cores , and they both have a 3 GB RAM, the Galaxy Note 3 also counts with a graphics co-processor.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 shoots a bit better videos and photos than Samsung W2016, although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for capturing images and/or video in low-light environments, a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a back camera with a worse 13 megapixels resolution.
The Galaxy Note 3 has a way bigger memory for applications and games than Samsung W2016, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy Note 3 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 64 GB. Galaxy Note 3 has a way better battery lifetime than Samsung W2016, because it has a 3200mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.