Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 5.1 |
| -- | 2015-08-13 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Metal | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 3.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a general score of 79.3, which is just a bit better than Samsung W2016's general score of 72.2. Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is a just a little lighter and way thinner cellphone than Samsung W2016. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has an older 5.1 version and Samsung W2016 has Android 5.1 Lollipop version.
The Samsung W2016 has a little faster processor than Galaxy Note 5, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with more cpu cores. Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a more vivid display than Samsung W2016, because it has a way higher 2560 x 1440 resolution, a really larger display and a higher screen pixels density.
The Galaxy Note 5's storage to store more apps and games is just as good as the Samsung W2016 one, both of them have the same internal storage. Samsung Galaxy Note 5 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung W2016, because it has a 3000mAh battery size against 2000mAh. Galaxy Note 5 shoots a bit better photos and videos than Samsung W2016. Both of them have a F1.9 aperture, the same (4K) video quality, the same video frame rate and a camera in the back with a 16 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.