Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-03-08 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.92 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 is much better than the Samsung W2016, with a general score of 88.3 against 72.2. Both devices in this comparison have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S10 has an older 11 version while Samsung W2016 has Android 5.1 Lollipop. Samsung Galaxy S10 is a notably thinner and somewhat lighter phone than the Samsung W2016.
Galaxy S10 has a sharper screen than Samsung W2016, because it has a better pixel count per inch in the display, a lot bigger screen and a lot better 1440 x 3040 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S10 has a superior storage for games and applications than Samsung W2016, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy S10 has a bit better hardware performance than Samsung W2016, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S10 also has 5 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy S10 has a slightly better camera than Samsung W2016, because although it has a back camera with a lot worse resolution and a lower (4K) video quality, it also counts with a lot larger camera aperture to capture better photos and video in low light situations.
The Galaxy S10 has a very superior battery life than Samsung W2016, because it has a 3400mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.