Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | -- |
| -- | 2019-03-08 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e is better than the Samsung W2016, with a overall score of 86.3 against 72.2. The Galaxy S10e body is incredibly thinner and lighter than Samsung W2016. Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung W2016, because it has a really larger screen, a much better 1080 x 2280px resolution and a little higher pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a little bit better performance than Samsung W2016, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy S10e has a lot bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung W2016, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy S10e captures clearer photographs and videos than Samsung W2016, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a much less mega-pixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a much bigger camera aperture to take better low light images. Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung W2016, because it has 3100mAh of battery capacity against 2000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.