Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-03-06 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 is a lot better than the Samsung W2016, getting a 94.8 score against 72.2. The Galaxy S20 construction is just a little lighter and much thinner than Samsung W2016. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S20 has the previous 13 version and Samsung W2016 has Android 5.1 Lollipop version.
The Galaxy S20 counts with a sharper screen than Samsung W2016, because it has more pixels per display inch, a lot higher 1440 x 3200 resolution and a way larger screen. Galaxy S20 counts with just a bit better processing power than Samsung W2016, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S20 also has 9 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung W2016, because although it has a back camera with a way worse resolution, it also counts with a much better video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture. The Galaxy S20 counts with a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung W2016, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy S20 features a superior battery life than Samsung W2016, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.