Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-10-02 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a global score of 90.8, which is a lot better than the Samsung W2016's 72.2 general score. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is a way thinner but a little heavier cellphone than the Samsung W2016. Both devices in this comparison review use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has an older 11 version while Samsung W2016 has Android 5.1 Lollipop.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a little bit better looking screen than Samsung W2016, because it has a much better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a quite better pixels density and a way bigger display. Galaxy S20 FE has a bit better CPU than Samsung W2016, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S20 FE also has 3 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy S20 FE shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung W2016, because although it has a lot lower resolution camera and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a bigger aperture. The Galaxy S20 FE features a very superior memory to store more games and applications than Samsung W2016, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and an external memory card slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy S20 FE has a much better battery performance than Samsung W2016, because it has a 125 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.