Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-03-06 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than Samsung W2016, getting a global score of 98 against 72.2. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G design is heavier but much thinner than the Samsung W2016. Both devices in this review work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the older 13 version and Samsung W2016 has Android 5.1 Lollipop version.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a brighter display than Samsung W2016, because it has more pixels per screen inch, a much better 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution and a way larger screen. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features much more storage to store more games and applications than Samsung W2016, because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung W2016, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much better camera than Samsung W2016, because it has a larger aperture to take better captures in low-light situations, a much higher video resolution and a back facing camera with way more MP.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a very superior battery duration than Samsung W2016, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.