Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 14 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | -- |
| 6.35 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a global score of 90.7, which is a lot better than the Samsung W2016's score of 72.2. Both of these phones include Android OS, but Galaxy S25 Ultra has the previous 14 version and Samsung W2016 has Android 5.1 Lollipop version. Galaxy S25 Ultra's design is much thinner and extremely lighter than the Samsung W2016.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much better display than Samsung W2016, because it has a much better resolution of 1440 x 3088px, a higher display pixels density and a really larger screen. The Samsung W2016 has a much more powerful CPU than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 9 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung W2016, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The Galaxy S25 Ultra captures greater photographs and videos than Samsung W2016, because it has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photography in low light situations, a back facing camera with much more megapixels and a way better 7680x4320 video definition.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a superior battery lifetime than Samsung W2016, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.