Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| -- | 2016-03-11 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.92 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 edge is a little bit better than the Samsung W2016, having a general score of 78.1 against 72.2. Galaxy S7 edge's body is somewhat lighter and extremely thinner than Samsung W2016. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS, but the Galaxy S7 edge has the newer 8.0 Oreo version while Samsung W2016 has Android 5.1 Lollipop version.
Galaxy S7 edge features a little bit better looking display than Samsung W2016, because it has a much better 1440 x 2560 resolution, a better pixel density and a really bigger display. The Samsung W2016 has a bit better performance than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores (although they are slower).
Galaxy S7 edge features a bigger memory to install games and applications than Samsung W2016, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 200 GB. Samsung Galaxy S7 edge captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung W2016, because although it has a way worse 12 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a worse video resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to capture better captures in low light environments.
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge features a way better battery duration than Samsung W2016, because it has an 80% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.