Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 is much better than Samsung W2016, having a general score of 83.3 against 72.2. The Galaxy S9 design is extremely thinner and just a little bit lighter than the Samsung W2016. Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung W2016, because it has a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, a really bigger screen and a way better 1440 x 2960 resolution.
Galaxy S9 has a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung W2016, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S9 also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 400 GB. Galaxy S9 counts with a little better hardware performance than Samsung W2016, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S9 also has 1 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy S9 counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung W2016, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a camera with a lot lower resolution, it also counts with a lot larger camera aperture for better low-light photos. Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a really longer battery life than Samsung W2016, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.