Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-01-31 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 383 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 3.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is better than Samsung W2016, having an 81 score against 72.2. Galaxy XCover Pro is a heavier but noticeably thinner phone than Samsung W2016. These phones use Android OS, but the Galaxy XCover Pro has 11 version and Samsung W2016 has Android 5.1 Lollipop version. The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung W2016, because it has a little bit greater pixel count per inch of display, a lot higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a lot bigger display.
Galaxy XCover Pro has a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung W2016, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung W2016, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro captures clearer photographs and videos than Samsung W2016, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a much more mega pixels back facing camera and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a much better battery lifetime than Samsung W2016, because it has a 103% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.