Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-09-18 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is much better than the Samsung W2016's general score of 72.2. Both devices in our current comparison use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has older 11 version and Samsung W2016 has Android 5.1 Lollipop. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is extremely thinner but way heavier than the Samsung W2016.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung W2016, because although it has a just a bit lower count of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a really larger display and a lot higher 1768 x 2208 pixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung W2016, because it has 192 GB more internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit better hardware performance than Samsung W2016, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a very superior battery life than Samsung W2016, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit better camera than Samsung W2016, because although it has a lower (4K) video definition and a lot lower 12 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.