Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-08-11 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 9.57 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a score of 90.6, which is a lot better than the Samsung W2016's 72.2 global score. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a incredibly heavier but much thinner cellphone than Samsung W2016. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has the previous 11 version and Samsung W2016 has Android 5.1 Lollipop version.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a bit sharper display than Samsung W2016, because although it has a quite lower pixels density, it also counts with a really larger display and a much better resolution of 1768 x 2208. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung W2016, because it has more internal memory.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has just a bit better processing power than Samsung W2016, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM. The Samsung W2016 shoots way better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a larger aperture and a camera in the back with a way higher resolution.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a much longer battery performance than Samsung W2016, because it has a 120 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.