Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-03-28 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Silver |
| Metal | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 is much better than Samsung W2016, with a global score of 82.3 against 72.2. The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 body is heavier but incredibly thinner than the Samsung W2016. Both phones in this comparison include Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 has the previous 10 version while Samsung W2016 has Android 5.1 Lollipop version.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 has a little better hardware performance than Samsung W2016, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Black Shark 2 counts with a little bit better display than Samsung W2016, because it has a way higher 1080 x 2340 resolution, a quite higher amount of pixels in each screen inch and a lot bigger screen.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 shoots much clearer videos and photos than Samsung W2016, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 also has a larger camera aperture to capture better captures in low light situations and a way better 48 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 features a way bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung W2016, because it has more internal storage. Xiaomi Black Shark 2 has a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung W2016, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.