Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-08 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver |
| Metal | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 is better than the Samsung W2016, getting an 86.6 score against 72.2. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has older 10 version and Samsung W2016 has Android 5.1 Lollipop. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 body is extremely thinner but somewhat heavier than Samsung W2016.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung W2016, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has more RAM. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a bit sharper display than Samsung W2016, because it has a lot larger display, a just a bit more pixels per inch of display and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a much better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung W2016, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 shoots much better photos and videos than Samsung W2016, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has a lot more mega-pixels camera, a larger aperture and better 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a really longer battery life than Samsung W2016, because it has 4720mAh of battery capacity instead of 2000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.