Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-07-24 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.13 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue, Gray and White |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 282 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 4030mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi A3 is a little bit better than Samsung W2016, getting a 79.2 score against 72.2. The Xiaomi Mi A3 is a noticeably thinner and just a bit lighter phone than the Samsung W2016. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Mi A3 has older 11 version while Samsung W2016 has Android 5.1 Lollipop.
The Xiaomi Mi A3 counts with a processor that is just as good as the CPU in Samsung W2016, and although the Xiaomi Mi A3 has 1 GB more RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Samsung W2016 has a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi A3, because although it has a bit worse 768 x 1280px resolution and a much smaller display, it also counts with a better number of pixels per inch of screen.
The Xiaomi Mi A3 captures much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung W2016, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Mi A3 also has a bigger aperture for better low-light photography and a much better 48 MP resolution back facing camera.
The Xiaomi Mi A3 counts with a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung W2016, because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external SD slot that supports up to 256 GB. Xiaomi Mi A3 counts with a much better battery duration than Samsung W2016, because it has a 102% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.