Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | -- |
| -- | 2017-06-01 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 6.85 x 3.49 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.44 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Gold |
| Metal | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 295.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 383 pixels per inch | 344 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| -- | Micro SIM |
| 2.4 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 5300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.92 | 7.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Max 2 has a global score of 77.5, which is a little bit better than the Samsung W2016's 72.2 global score. Xiaomi Mi Max 2 is a notably thinner but heavier cellphone than Samsung W2016. The Xiaomi Mi Max 2's processing unit is very similar to Samsung W2016's CPU, and although the Xiaomi Mi Max 2 has more RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Samsung W2016 has a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because although it has a much lower 768 x 1280 resolution and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater pixels density. The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 counts with much more memory for games and applications than Samsung W2016, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 128 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 counts with a much better battery duration than Samsung W2016, because it has a 165% greater battery capacity. Samsung W2016 and Xiaomi Mi Max 2 both count with similar cameras, although the Xiaomi Mi Max 2 has a tinier aperture which is worse for taking images and/or video in low-light environments, a lot lower resolution back facing camera and a lower video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.