Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | -- |
| -- | 2018-11-01 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue and Green |
| Metal | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is much better than Samsung W2016, having an 83.8 score against 72.2. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3's design is heavier but extremely thinner than the Samsung W2016. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a bit superior processing unit than Samsung W2016, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung W2016, because it has a much larger display, a little bit better pixels number in each screen inch and a way higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung W2016, because it has 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a way better battery life than Samsung W2016, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung W2016, because although it has a lower (4K) video resolution and a camera with way less megapixels, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better photography and videos in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.