Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-07-19 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 8 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 2488 x 2224 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 417 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.92 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has an overall score of 84.3, which is much better than Samsung W2016's overall score of 72.2. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 design is a lot thinner but way heavier than the Samsung W2016. Both devices in our current comparison use Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has older 14 version and Samsung W2016 has Android 5.1 Lollipop version.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a way better display than Samsung W2016, because it has a way larger display, a bit better count of pixels per screen inch and a much higher 2224 x 2488px resolution. The Samsung W2016 counts with a much better performing processing unit than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung W2016, because it has 192 GB more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 shoots greater videos and photos than Samsung W2016, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photos and video in low-light environments, a back camera with much more mega pixels and a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a much better battery duration than Samsung W2016, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity instead of 2000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.