Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-11-20 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora green, Glacier white and Midnight black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 377.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 13.09 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.92 | 6.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 is much better than the Samsung W2016, having a global score of 83.7 against 72.2. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 construction is extremely thinner but somewhat heavier than the Samsung W2016. Both of these devices use Android OS, but Xiaomi Mi Note 10 has older 10 version while Samsung W2016 has Android 5.1 Lollipop version.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 counts with a bit superior processor than Samsung W2016, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 counts with a little bit better looking screen than Samsung W2016, because it has a bit higher display density, a way higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a much larger display.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 counts with a very superior memory to store more apps and games than Samsung W2016, because it has 128 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 features a much longer battery duration than Samsung W2016, because it has a 5260mAh battery size. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 takes greater pictures and videos than Samsung W2016, and although they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 also has a much higher resolution camera in the back and a bigger aperture to capture better low light captures and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.