Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-12 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a general score of 87.9, which is much better than Samsung W2016's overall score of 72.2. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a somewhat heavier but a lot thinner phone than Samsung W2016. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has an older 10 version while Samsung W2016 has Android 5.1 Lollipop.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a better looking screen than Samsung W2016, because it has a little greater number of pixels per inch of display, a way bigger display and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a way bigger memory for apps and games than Samsung W2016, because it has 64 GB more internal memory.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung W2016, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has more RAM. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a much longer battery performance than Samsung W2016, because it has a 135% larger battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro takes a lot better photographs and videos than Samsung W2016, and although they both have the same aperture, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a way higher 7680x4320 video definition and a much more mega-pixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.