Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| -- | 2019-09-20 |
| 5.03 x 2.42 x 0.62 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 525 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 Pro Max is much better than Samsung W2017, having a overall score of 85.3 against 73.2. IPhone 11 Pro Max's design is a little heavier but much thinner than the Samsung W2017. The iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with iOS 15.x operating system, while Samsung W2017 works with Android 6.0 Marshmallow operating system.
The iPhone 11 Pro Max has just a bit better display than Samsung W2017, because although it has a bit worse screen density, it also counts with a lot bigger screen and a better resolution of 1242 x 2688 pixels. IPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a faster processor than Samsung W2017, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the iPhone 11 Pro Max also has a 64-bits CPU and a greater number of faster cores.
IPhone 11 Pro Max has a bit better camera than Samsung W2017, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for taking images and videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a same resolution camera, the iPhone 11 Pro Max also counts with faster 60 frames per second video frame rates.
The Samsung W2017 features a much greater storage to install games and applications than iPhone 11 Pro Max, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung W2017 also has an external SD slot that allows up to 256 GB. IPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a really longer battery performance than Samsung W2017, because it has a 73% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.