Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| -- | 2018-09-21 |
| 5.03 x 2.42 x 0.62 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 525 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XS has a score of 84.2, which is much better than Samsung W2017's 73.2 overall score. IPhone XS's body is thinner and lighter than Samsung W2017. The iPhone XS has a quite superior processing power than Samsung W2017, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the iPhone XS also has a larger number of cores and a 64 bits processing unit.
The Apple iPhone XS counts with a slightly better looking screen than Samsung W2017, because although it has a just a little lower pixels number in each screen inch, it also counts with a much bigger screen and a bit higher 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution. Samsung W2017 counts with a much better memory to install applications and games than iPhone XS, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the Samsung W2017 also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB.
Apple iPhone XS counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung W2017, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and video, and they both have the same video definition and a back facing camera with a 12 mega pixels resolution, the Apple iPhone XS also counts with better video frame rate.
IPhone XS features a bit longer battery duration than Samsung W2017, because it has 2659mAh of battery capacity instead of 2300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.