Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-20 |
| 5.03 x 2.42 x 0.62 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Just black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 525 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is much better than Samsung W2017, getting a global score of 82.9 against 73.2. Google Pixel 4a is a a lot lighter and thinner cellphone than the Samsung W2017. Both phones in this review come with Android operating system, but the Google Pixel 4a has 11 version while Samsung W2017 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
Samsung W2017 counts with a little bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a really smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a quite better display density. The Google Pixel 4a has just a bit better processing power than Samsung W2017, because it has more cpu cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4a shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung W2017, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the same (4K) video definition and a F1.7 aperture, the Google Pixel 4a also has a back-facing camera with a higher resolution. Samsung W2017 features just a bit more storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 256 GB.
Google Pixel 4a counts with a really longer battery duration than Samsung W2017, because it has a 37 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.