Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.03 x 2.42 x 0.62 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 525 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is much better than Samsung W2017, with a score of 81.3 against 73.2. The LG V35 ThinQ is a a lot thinner and much lighter cellphone than Samsung W2017. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit better CPU than Samsung W2017, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a larger number of cores (and also faster).
LG V35 ThinQ features a bit better looking display than Samsung W2017, because it has a quite higher pixel quantity in each inch in the display, a lot bigger screen and a lot higher 1440 x 2880px resolution. LG V35 ThinQ has a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung W2017, and although they both have the same internal storage, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V35 ThinQ shoots a bit better photos and videos than Samsung W2017, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a larger camera aperture to take better low light captures and a camera with a much higher resolution. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a superior battery duration than Samsung W2017, because it has a 43 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.