Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| -- | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.03 x 2.42 x 0.62 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 525 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a score of 87.1, which is much better than the Samsung W2017's overall score of 73.2. LG Velvet's construction is a lot thinner and somewhat lighter than Samsung W2017. LG Velvet has just a little better processing power than Samsung W2017, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a greater number of cores.
The Samsung W2017 has a little sharper screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a way smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 1920px resolution, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display. The LG Velvet counts with a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than Samsung W2017, because it has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The LG Velvet features a way better battery duration than Samsung W2017, because it has a 4300mAh battery size against 2300mAh. LG Velvet counts with a lot better camera than Samsung W2017, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low light captures and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the LG Velvet also counts with a camera with much more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.