Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-12-07 |
| 5.03 x 2.42 x 0.62 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPS |
| 525 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G 5G has a general score of 81.5, which is better than the Samsung W2017's general score of 73.2. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Moto G 5G has 10 version while Samsung W2017 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. The Moto G 5G is a a bit heavier but way thinner cellphone than the Samsung W2017.
Moto G 5G has a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung W2017, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Moto G 5G also has more CPU cores. The Samsung W2017 features a little bit better display than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution and a really smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel density.
The Motorola Moto G 5G counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung W2017, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Motorola Moto G 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Moto G 5G counts with a really longer battery duration than Samsung W2017, because it has a 117% more battery size.
Moto G 5G has a much better camera than Samsung W2017, and although they both have the same video frame rate, a same size camera aperture and the same video definition, the Moto G 5G also has a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.