Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-11-18 |
| 5.03 x 2.42 x 0.62 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| -- | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 525 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.35 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto G200 5G is better than the Samsung W2017, getting an 86.2 score against 73.2. Both phones in this review have Android operating system, but Moto G200 5G has an older 11 version and Samsung W2017 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. Moto G200 5G is a notably thinner and a little lighter cellphone than Samsung W2017.
The Moto G200 5G has a bit better processing unit than Samsung W2017, because it has 4 more processing cores and a higher amount of RAM. Samsung W2017 features a little more vivid display than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a really smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a greater display density.
Samsung W2017 counts with a slightly bigger memory to store more apps and games than Moto G200 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB. Moto G200 5G shoots way better photos and videos than Samsung W2017, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a much better 108 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a very superior battery life than Samsung W2017, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 2300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.