Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 12 |
| -- | 2022-08-18 |
| 5.03 x 2.42 x 0.62 inches | 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 525 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.4 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2022) has a general score of 81.1, which is much better than the Samsung W2017's 73.2 global score. The Motorola razr (2022) body is notably thinner and just a little bit lighter than the Samsung W2017. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola razr (2022) has older 12 version and Samsung W2017 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
The Samsung W2017 counts with a little bit better looking screen than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution and a really smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch. Motorola razr (2022) counts with a more powerful processor than Samsung W2017, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a greater number of cores.
Samsung W2017 features a slightly better memory to store more games and applications than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 256 GB. Motorola razr (2022) features a superior battery life than Samsung W2017, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola razr (2022) shoots much clearer videos and photos than Samsung W2017, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing photos and videos in low light situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola razr (2022) also counts with a much more mega pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.