Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| -- | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.03 x 2.42 x 0.62 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 525 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is much better than Samsung W2017, with a general score of 83.8 against 73.2. The Galaxy A50 is a incredibly thinner and extremely lighter device than the Samsung W2017. Samsung Galaxy A50 features just a little better processing power than Samsung W2017, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a larger number of faster cores.
Samsung W2017 features just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A50, because although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 1920px resolution and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels count in each display inch. Samsung Galaxy A50 takes a little bit better photos and videos than Samsung W2017, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a camera with a lot better resolution.
Galaxy A50 counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung W2017, because it has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A50 has a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung W2017, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.