Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-10-20 |
| 5.03 x 2.42 x 0.62 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 525 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s is better than the Samsung W2017, having an 86.6 score against 73.2. Both phones in this comparison have Android operating system, but the Galaxy A50s has 10 version while Samsung W2017 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. Galaxy A50s's body is lighter and a lot thinner than the Samsung W2017.
The Samsung W2017 counts with a little bit better screen than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920px, it also counts with a greater pixel density. The Galaxy A50s features a little bit better processing power than Samsung W2017, because it has more RAM memory and 4 more cores.
Samsung Galaxy A50s captures much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung W2017, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also counts with a much better resolution back-facing camera.
The Galaxy A50s counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung W2017, because it has more internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A50s features a very superior battery performance than Samsung W2017, because it has a 74% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.