Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| -- | 2021-03-17 |
| 5.03 x 2.42 x 0.62 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| -- | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 525 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is a lot better than Samsung W2017, with a 90.7 score against 73.2. Galaxy A52 is a thinner and just a little bit lighter cellphone than the Samsung W2017. Samsung Galaxy A52 has just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung W2017, because it has more RAM and a greater number of cores.
The Samsung W2017 features a bit sharper display than Galaxy A52, because although it has a much smaller display and a little lower 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with more pixels per display inch. The Samsung Galaxy A52 has much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung W2017, because it has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory.
Galaxy A52 has a much better battery life than Samsung W2017, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A52 takes much better photos and videos than Samsung W2017, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.