Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 12, 11 |
| -- | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.03 x 2.42 x 0.62 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 525 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is a lot better than Samsung W2017, having a score of 91.3 against 73.2. Both phones we are comparing have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A52 5G has older 12 version and Samsung W2017 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. Galaxy A52 5G is a a bit lighter and thinner device than the Samsung W2017.
Galaxy A52 5G has a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung W2017, because it has 4 more cores and 2 GB more RAM memory. Samsung W2017 features just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a really smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a much better camera than Samsung W2017, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light images, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung W2017, because it has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1 TB and more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a superior battery performance than Samsung W2017, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 2300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.