Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.03 x 2.42 x 0.62 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.2 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 525 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is a lot better than the Samsung W2017's 73.2 global score. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra design has the same weight than Samsung W2017, but it's noticeably thinner. These phones include Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version and Samsung W2017 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a slightly better looking display than Samsung W2017, because although it has a little bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a way better 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution and a lot larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a more powerful processor than Samsung W2017, because it has 8 GB more RAM memory and more cores.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes a lot better photos and videos than Samsung W2017, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low light photos and videos, it also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a much better video quality. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung W2017, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a way better battery lifetime than Samsung W2017, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 2300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.