Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-03-08 |
| 5.03 x 2.42 x 0.62 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 525 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 is much better than the Samsung W2017, getting a overall score of 88.3 against 73.2. Galaxy S10's construction is a lot thinner and incredibly lighter than Samsung W2017. These phones include Android operating system, but Galaxy S10 has the previous 11 version and Samsung W2017 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung W2017, because it has a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen, a lot better 1440 x 3040 resolution and a really bigger screen. Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a bit more powerful processor than Samsung W2017, because it has more RAM and a greater number of cores.
Galaxy S10 has much more storage for applications and games than Samsung W2017, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Galaxy S10 features a little bit better camera than Samsung W2017, and although they both have a 12 MP camera and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy S10 also has better 60 fps video frame rates and a larger camera aperture for better photos and video in low light situations.
Galaxy S10 features a really longer battery lifetime than Samsung W2017, because it has a 48 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.