Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.03 x 2.42 x 0.62 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 525 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is way better than the Samsung W2017, having a 90.8 score against 73.2. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has an older 11 version and Samsung W2017 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is a thinner and a little lighter phone than the Samsung W2017.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a bit more powerful processor than Samsung W2017, because it has 4 more cpu cores and a larger amount of RAM. Samsung W2017 has a slightly better screen than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a really smaller display and a little lower 1080 x 1920px resolution, it also counts with a greater display density.
Galaxy S20 FE counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than Samsung W2017, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a superior battery performance than Samsung W2017, because it has a 96 percent larger battery capacity.
The Galaxy S20 FE has a much better camera than Samsung W2017, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light captures and videos, and they both have the same resolution back facing camera and the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy S20 FE also counts with faster video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.