Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 12 |
| -- | 2022-06-29 |
| 5.03 x 2.42 x 0.62 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 525 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 9.35 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover 6 Pro is a little bit better than Samsung W2017, getting a 77.6 score against 73.2. The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro construction is heavier but much thinner than Samsung W2017. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has the older 12 version while Samsung W2017 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
Samsung W2017 counts with a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a way smaller screen and a little worse 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a greater pixel density. The Samsung W2017 counts with a really superior hardware performance than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (although faster).
The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung W2017, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro and Samsung W2017 count with extremely similar cameras, because although the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a much higher 50 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with a very superior battery performance than Samsung W2017, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.