Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.03 x 2.42 x 0.62 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 525 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a score of 92.3, which is much better than Samsung W2017's 73.2 overall score. Galaxy Z Flip 5G's design is way thinner and somewhat lighter than the Samsung W2017. Both devices we are comparing use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an older 11 version while Samsung W2017 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a faster processing unit than Samsung W2017, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a greater number of cores. The Samsung W2017 has a little sharper display than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a quite better display pixel density.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G takes a bit better videos and photos than Samsung W2017, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same resolution back-facing camera, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also counts with higher video frame rates. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung W2017, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a much better battery performance than Samsung W2017, because it has a 43% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.