Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.03 x 2.42 x 0.62 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.2 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 525 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 9.35 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has an overall score of 90.6, which is way better than the Samsung W2017's score of 73.2. Both devices we compare here include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has the older 11 version while Samsung W2017 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3's body is a lot thinner but incredibly heavier than Samsung W2017.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit better performance than Samsung W2017, because it has a larger number of cores (and also faster) and a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung W2017 has a slightly better display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a much lower resolution of 1080 x 1920, it also counts with a greater display pixels density.
Samsung W2017 shoots a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have a back camera with a 12 MP, the Samsung W2017 also has a way bigger camera aperture to take better images and video in low-light environments. Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung W2017, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a much longer battery performance than Samsung W2017, because it has a 91 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.