Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-06-17 |
| 5.03 x 2.42 x 0.62 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue |
| -- | Metal and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 525 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9T is much better than the Samsung W2017, having a score of 82.2 against 73.2. The Xiaomi Mi 9T design is extremely thinner and just a bit lighter than the Samsung W2017. These devices come with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Mi 9T has the older 10 version while Samsung W2017 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
Samsung W2017 has a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920, it also counts with a better pixel count per inch in the screen. Samsung W2017 has a slightly better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 256 GB.
Xiaomi Mi 9T counts with a little faster processor than Samsung W2017, because it has a greater number of cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Mi 9T captures greater videos and photos than Samsung W2017, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Mi 9T also counts with a way better 48 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T counts with a much better battery lifetime than Samsung W2017, because it has a 74% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.