Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 80.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-09 |
| 5.03 x 2.42 x 0.62 inches | 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Glacier white, Midnight black and Nebula purple |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 377.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 525 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has an overall score of 80.6, which is much better than the Samsung W2017's general score of 73.2. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite construction is a little lighter and notably thinner than Samsung W2017. These phones use Android OS, but Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has older 11 version and Samsung W2017 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite features just a bit better performance than Samsung W2017, because it has a higher number of cores and a greater amount of RAM. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite features a slightly better looking display than Samsung W2017, because although it has a little lower pixels density, it also counts with a really larger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite counts with a much better camera than Samsung W2017, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite also counts with a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
The Samsung W2017 has a much greater storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung W2017 also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 256 GB. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite counts with a way better battery performance than Samsung W2017, because it has 5260mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.