Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-12 |
| 5.03 x 2.42 x 0.62 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 525 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is much better than the Samsung W2017, with an 87.9 score against 73.2. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS, but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has 10 version and Samsung W2017 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro body is thinner but just a bit heavier than Samsung W2017.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung W2017, because although it has a lot lower pixels amount per screen inch, it also counts with a really bigger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a bit superior CPU than Samsung W2017, because it has a larger amount of RAM and 4 more CPU cores.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro shoots way better photographs and videos than Samsung W2017, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking images and/or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a way more MP camera in the back and a much higher 7680x4320 video quality. Samsung W2017 features a little bit better memory to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits up to 256 GB.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a really longer battery duration than Samsung W2017, because it has a 104% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.