Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 87.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-03-27 |
| 5.03 x 2.42 x 0.62 inches | 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.91 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Arctic white, Deep Ocean blue and Night black |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 525 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4520mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6.4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F3 is better than the Samsung W2017, getting a overall score of 87.3 against 73.2. Xiaomi Poco F3's design is a little lighter and notably thinner than Samsung W2017. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Poco F3 has an older 11 version and Samsung W2017 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
The Xiaomi Poco F3 has a greater processing power than Samsung W2017, because it has more processing cores and more RAM memory. Xiaomi Poco F3 counts with just a bit better looking screen than Samsung W2017, because although it has a lot worse pixels density, it also counts with a lot bigger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Samsung W2017 has a little bit better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco F3, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB. The Xiaomi Poco F3 has a superior battery performance than Samsung W2017, because it has a 4520mAh battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Poco F3 captures a lot better videos and photos than Samsung W2017, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco F3 also counts with a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.