Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.2 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-05 |
| 5.03 x 2.42 x 0.62 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 525 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is much better than Samsung W2017, getting a overall score of 81.1 against 73.2. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro body is a little bit heavier but incredibly thinner than the Samsung W2017. Both phones we are comparing here come with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has older 10 version and Samsung W2017 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a little faster CPU than Samsung W2017, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a higher number of cores. The Samsung W2017 has a little bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a way smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 1920, it also counts with a greater count of pixels per display inch.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a bit more memory to install applications and games than Samsung W2017, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a greater camera than Samsung W2017, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for shooting photographs or videos in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a way more mega pixels back facing camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a much longer battery duration than Samsung W2017, because it has a 5020mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.