Compare phones
|
|
| Global Score | |
| 22.5 | 24.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sanyo | Kyocera |
| -- | 2006-09-13 |
| 3.35 x 1.85 x 1.04 inches | 3.39 x 1.73 x 0.83 inches |
| 3.57 ounces | 3.28 ounces |
| $ 155.00 | $ 90.00 |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| STN | -- |
| -- | 101 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 5 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| CDMA | CDMA |
| 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 312 hours standby time 3.3 hours talk time | 180 hours standby time 3.7 hours talk time |
| 2.56 | 2.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
Comparison review
Kyocera Marbl is just a bit better than the Sanyo SCP-200, getting a general score of 24.5 against 22.5. The Kyocera Marbl design is a bit lighter and way thinner than Sanyo SCP-200. The Kyocera Marbl counts with a much better looking display than Sanyo SCP-200. They have the same resolution of 128 x 128px.
The Kyocera Marbl features as much memory capacity to install applications and games as the Sanyo SCP-200. The Kyocera Marbl and Sanyo SCP-200 feature very similar processors, both of them have a 0-Core processor. The Kyocera Marbl and Sanyo SCP-200 count with similar cameras. The Sanyo SCP-200 has just a little better battery life than Kyocera Marbl, because it has a 1000mAh battery size.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the Kyocera Marbl is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.