Compare phones
Motorola W175
W175, W175g, W180| Global Score | |
| 25.5 | 28.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sanyo | Motorola |
| -- | 2007-10-11 |
| 3.33 x 1.86 x 1.14 inches | 4.48 x 1.69 x 0.55 inches |
| 3.88 ounces | 2.99 ounces |
| $ 40.00 | $ 40.00 |
| 120 x 144 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| TFT | STN |
| -- | 101 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 5.2 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| Camera | |
| 0.10 MP | -- |
| 3.08 | 0 |
| CDMA | GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 940mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 257 hours standby time 2.8 hours talk time | 465 hours standby time 9.8 hours talk time |
| 2.56 | 2.48 |
| GPS | -- |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola W175 has an overall score of 28.6, which is better than the Sanyo SCP-8100's 25.5 overall score. Motorola W175's construction is notably thinner and incredibly lighter than the Sanyo SCP-8100. The Sanyo SCP-8100 and the Motorola W175 both feature similar processors, both have a 0-Core processor.
The Motorola W175 features an incredibly better display than Sanyo SCP-8100, although it has a quite lower resolution of 128 x 128px. The Sanyo SCP-8100 and the Motorola W175 both feature similar memory capacity for applications and games. Sanyo SCP-8100 features just a little better battery life than Motorola W175, because it has a 6% greater battery capacity.
Sanyo SCP-8100 shoots much better pictures and videos than Motorola W175.
Motorola W175 and the Sanyo SCP-8100 cost exactly the same, which makes it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.