Compare phones
Sanyo Taho
E4100| Global Score | |
| 31.4 | 34.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sanyo | Motorola |
| 2010-12-09 | 2006-07-25 |
| 4.00 x 2.00 x 0.90 inches | 4.15 x 1.79 x 0.62 inches |
| 4.70 ounces | 4.05 ounces |
| Black | -- |
| $ 250.00 | $ 120.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2 inches | -- |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 176 x 220 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| 200 pixels per inch | 128 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.3 | 5.6 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 20,48 MB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 0.3 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 2.00 MP |
| 4.73 | 4.73 |
| CDMA | EDGE and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1050mAh Li-Ion Battery | 780mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.1 hours talk time | 350 hours standby time 6.7 hours talk time |
| 2.64 | 2.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 1.2 |
| GPS | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola ROKR Z3 is a bit better than the Sanyo Taho, getting a 34.5 score against 31.4. Motorola ROKR Z3's design is way thinner and lighter than the Sanyo Taho, despite of the fact that it was released 4 years before. Sanyo Taho counts with a sharper screen than Motorola ROKR Z3, because it has a better resolution of 320 x 240 and much more pixels per screen inch.
Sanyo Taho features a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola ROKR Z3. Motorola ROKR Z3's CPU is very similar to the processing unit in Sanyo Taho, although the Motorola ROKR Z3 has a lower number of cores. Sanyo Taho features improved battery life than Motorola ROKR Z3, because it has a 1050mAh battery size.
Motorola ROKR Z3 and Sanyo Taho both have very similar cameras, both of them have the same resolution camera.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, Motorola ROKR Z3 is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.