Compare phones
Sanyo Taho
E4100| Global Score | |
| 31.4 | 34.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sanyo | Samsung |
| 2010-12-09 | 2009-09-14 |
| 4.00 x 2.00 x 0.90 inches | 3.70 x 1.78 x 0.59 inches |
| 4.70 ounces | 3.17 ounces |
| Black | -- |
| $ 250.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2 inches | 2 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 128 x 160 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| 200 pixels per inch | 102 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.3 | 5.2 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 1.32 | 0 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 0.30 MP |
| 4.73 | 3.63 |
| CDMA | CDMA |
| 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1050mAh Li-Ion Battery | 960mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.1 hours talk time | 6.3 hours talk time |
| 2.64 | 2.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 2.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
Comparison review
The Samsung SPH-M330 has a global score of 34.4, which is just a bit better than the Sanyo Taho's overall score of 31.4. Despite of the fact that the Samsung SPH-M330 is older than Sanyo Taho, it's body is a lot lighter and noticeably thinner. The Sanyo Taho features an incredibly better display than Samsung SPH-M330, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Sanyo Taho also has a way higher 320 x 240px resolution and a way better pixel number per screen inch.
Samsung SPH-M330 counts with a processor that is just as good as the Sanyo Taho one, although the Samsung SPH-M330 has lesser cores. Sanyo Taho counts with a greater camera than Samsung SPH-M330, because it has a back camera with lot more mega pixels. Sanyo Taho has a superior storage for applications and games than Samsung SPH-M330, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 32 GB.
Sanyo Taho counts with a little better battery lifetime than Samsung SPH-M330, because it has a 9 percent larger battery size.
Samsung SPH-M330 is not only the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.